![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
Actions
Taken:
1) Facilitated a series of Rapid Improvement Events (Kaizen).
2) Re-balanced the work content in each of the Assembly Cells.
3) Developed and implemented layout improvements to accommodate new balance.
4) Standardized work content and tasks across both shifts.
5) Developed and implemented an improved Preventive Maintenance Program.
6) Developed and implemented a visual display board at each cell with the
following key measurements: hourly throughput; downtime due to maintenance;
downtime due to material outages; labor minutes per assembly.
7) Developed and implemented a daily Shop Tour of the display boards where
management could review plant performance in real time.
Results:
4
Standard manpower reduced from 249 to 172.
4 Resulting
in an annualized savings of approximately US$1,925,000.
4
Maintenance related downtime reduced by over 30% and productivity improved
by up to 35%.
| ©2003 Process
Impact Inc. |
| In order to view our Flash
presentation, please download the latest free version of Macromedia
Flash Player. |
Baseline Conditions:
4
The Client is a manufacturer of metal fabricated assemblies for the automotive
industry.
4 Mercedes- Benz,
GM, Saturn; Freightliner.
4
The project focused on eleven assembly cells in the clients 1 million
square foot facility.
4
The 650 hourly employees are represented by the UAW.
4
At project inception, the eleven assembly cells were manned with 249 operators,
on two shifts.
4
There was excessive overtime required to meet the daily and weekly demand on these
cells.
4
PPM defective for the major customer were at unacceptable levels.